Add To Favorites Online Watchers: 27
   Search Videos:  
 
  • Home
  • Top Rated Videos
  • Most Viewed
  • Most Recent
  • Recently Featured
  • Recently Published
  • Contact us
You are here: Home » CNBC: Ron Paul's question makes Ben Bernake's voice quiver

CNBC: Ron Paul's question makes Ben Bernake's voice quiver 

Get the latest Flash Player to see this video.
* HD format might not be available
Play in:   Low Quality | High Quality | HD Quality *
Bookmark and Share

Post a VIP comment

Your Name:
Comment:

Click for new code

VIP Comments (0)

Recent Comments (1639)

May 24, 2012
jhknight17 Says:
DAMN! He shut him the fuck up!!! hahahahahahahah robbing bastard! Ron Paul 2012
May 24, 2012
lovegrows2012 Says:
I encourage everyone to watch a documentary titled "One Third Of The Holocaust", which debunks and exposes holocaust myths and lies. (You can find it here on YouTube.) I did not create the film, nor do I know the person who did. I'm promoting the documentary because it helped change my worldview. We all need to do our part to spread the truth about the holocaust. Take care.
May 16, 2012
Majlerin Says:
"Each of the 17 "recessions" (...) were only corrected by credit/debt bubbles fueled by the Federal Reserve (...)" Ok, so you are indeed giving credit to the Fed for "correcting" the crisis. Seems about right. There's "nothing new about what's happening today", that's the whole point. Unregulated markets are much more unstable than regulated markets, and the Fed serves that purpose. It sets the optimal inflation rate and provides liquidity to banks etc. Leaving Keynesianism was a major mistake
May 16, 2012
Majlerin Says:
Most depressions and bank panics happened before the Fed. Q.E.D. And Ron Paul is impossible to take seriously.. he opposes the Separation of Church and State "lol"
May 16, 2012
rkymtntruther Says:
"lol" doesn't make me wrong. It only reflects that you have a sense of humor about your own misconceptions. Each of the 17 "recessions" as they are called since the great depression were only corrected by credit/debt bubbles fueled by the Federal Reserve and our currency's world reserve status, not savings of money or increased production. There have been 17. I tried to post the proof but youtube won't let me. You can google it if you'd like.
May 8, 2012
minja30000 Says:
Thats not true the money comes from foreign exchange reserves, it comes from the fed's balance sheet, and the value of the economy and the value the market gives it.
May 5, 2012
BenjiEDF Says:
5:52 That's Pinnochio checking to see how much longer his nose has grown and if anyone noticed!
May 2, 2012
MDethfan Says:
Ron Paul is for ending the FED by nationalizing it. There is absolutley no good reason why the FED acts as an independant agency that cannot be fully audited. Look what this one successful lawsuit agaisnt them turned up. The FED was ordered to reveal the names of banks that borrowed money at the so-called discount window during the credit crisis. /watch?v=ePgFy4TPA18
May 2, 2012
Majlerin Says:
ok thank you :) let me just leave with this thought: what is the alternative to the Fed, or to a any "central bank"? Would unregulated private banks, 'allowed to fall' according to nature of the markets, be better? Fuel growth, or bring stability? We can study how such a system would work by looking at what existed before the Fed. Today, given the highly flexible, unpredictable and globalized markets, the dangers are much higher. how banks fare w/o a central bank. food for thought
May 2, 2012
JoseyWales82 Says:
Well there you go. We finally have some common ground. I don't blame everything on the Fed. I believe theres plenty of blame to go around. I just can't buy that having the Fed controlling our currency is beneficial to us. We may never see eye to eye but I still wish you and yours the best of luck in the upcoming mess.
May 2, 2012
Majlerin Says:
When was the last big financial crisis in the US? The great depression? Q.E.D. Keynesian economics only started being applied after the great depression, so you can't blame the previous crisis on his economics lol
May 1, 2012
rkymtntruther Says:
You assume that we DON'T understand the "modern macro-economic and financial world". Most RP folks I've met have forgotten more about it than those who try to debate them will ever know. That won't prevent the aforementioned from THINKING they know more. Fact is, defenders of Keynes and others fail to realize there is nothing new about what's happening today. The fact that The FED departed from Keynes' own economic system "decades ago" is proof of this.
May 1, 2012
rkymtntruther Says:
You are absolutely right. Are you from Russia?
May 1, 2012
Majlerin Says:
lol. I'm not blindly supporting Keynes. But it is essential to understand the modern macro-economic and financial world. Also, Keynes himself defended a more protectionist approach than that followed by the US in the post-war (for ex, the Havana Charter and an universal currency, instead of Bretton Woods). Many people attribute the 2008 crisis to Keynes. Wrong. The Fed has deviated from keynes' economics decades ago, lead by Greenspan & Co, followed a more laissez-faire and non-intervention way
May 1, 2012
MarinRichard Says:
you had it going until you told us to read anything related to Keynes.
May 1, 2012
Majlerin Says:
honestly, you people should stop believing Zeitgeistian and conspiracy theorists alike, who know very little of economics... Try reading the General Theory of Keynes or some book on macroeconomics
May 1, 2012
Majlerin Says:
3) What I'm saying is if our current system is set up so its impossible to pay off our debt. Re-read my previous comment. No it is not.. Seriously man, read some history. Where does the "debt" come from? The Bush admin. war on terror! Did u know, but the US debt was MUCH higher before WW2. Many countries spend decades with higher debts without any problems. Eventually, if the economy does well, the debt lowers. To blame the national debt on the Fed is ridiculous. You can blame it on China lol
May 1, 2012
Majlerin Says:
1) It is private yes, as in owned by private shareholders, but public in the sense that it is state controlled: "Its authority is derived from statutes enacted by the U.S. Congress and the System is subject to congressional oversight. The members of the Board of Governors, including its chairman and vice-chairman, are chosen by the President and confirmed by the Senate." 2) that crisis and many others. The number of market crashes and bank panics was reduced A LOT by the creation of the Fed
May 1, 2012
JoseyWales82 Says:
1)The Fed is not private?...wtf? Who appointed the shareholders and who do you have to pay to be appointed to the board of directors? 2) Yeah that crises came about through deception perpetrated by J.P. Morgan. A lot of smaller banks went under and he was able to buy them up for pennies on the dollar. 3) What I'm saying is if our current system is set up so its impossible to pay off our debt. Re-read my previous comment.
May 1, 2012
Majlerin Says:
1) the Fed is not private.. wtf? The board of directors is appointed by the government 2) the crise, crises, existed BEFORE the Fed. The purpose of the Fed was to address and help aliviate and eliminate the crises and banking panics! And it fulfilled that job well, but not perfectly 3) every financial institution suffers from inflaction and debt. How do you think the US debt post-WWII was halved? Every country, company of bank borrows money, it's inevitable. It's called Capitalism
May 1, 2012
JoseyWales82 Says:
You are still missing the point. The real crisis started with The Federal Reserve Act.The fact is, the control of our currency was handed over to a private institution. This institution lends the U.S. government some shiny reserve notes (dollars) in exchange for some for some other shiny paper (bonds). The problem lies in that the bonds the fed recieves accrues interest. How do you pay back what you owe plus interest? Borrow more. Do you see the flaw? Its a downward spiral of increasing debt.
May 1, 2012
Majlerin Says:
Not that it matters, because Americans will never elect any *real* president and give them the power to change anything. Be it Ron Paul or someone from the left. A compromising, appeasing Barack Obama, controlled by a republican congress is the best you'll get for the next decade or 2.
May 1, 2012
Majlerin Says:
Well, i went to search for some video. This one is simple, brief, succinct and summarizes what everybody should see in libertarians and likewise: /watch?v=3B0Q109uQ7o "Libertarian ideology; it may sound nice in the surface, but if you think it through, it's just a call for corporate tyranny." - Chomsky

Video Details

NEW FUND RAISER COMING UP http://teaparty07.com ... (more) Added: November 09, 2007 NEW FUND RAISER COMING UP http://teaparty07.com wont you help us make history!! Have you noticed? Ron Paul is picking up a LOT of support within the financial community. So far, these are the names of v... More

NEW FUND RAISER COMING UP http://teaparty07.com ... (more) Added: November 09, 2007 NEW FUND RAISER COMING UP http://teaparty07.com wont you help us make history!! Have you noticed? Ron Paul is picking up a LOT of support within the financial community. So far, these are the names of very prominent investment advisers who have announced their support for Ron Paul: Axel Merk (Merk Hard Currency Fund), Harry Schultz (Harry Schultz Letter), Jim Rogers, (Jim Rogers.com), Richard Russell (Dow Theory Letters), and Peter Schiff (Euro Pacific Capital). Not to mention the Chicago pit traders who were cheering for Ron Paul when he went head to head with Bernanke! Also, I was down at a local silver / gold shop in Boston the other day and I handed the guy behind the counter a bill stamped with Ron Paul 2008 on it. Of course he knew about Ron Paul because of his honest money stance, and was a big supporter. Below are some brief excerpts and links to their full statements, where available. If you know of any others that I've missed - please post them in the comments section. I'd like to put together a very comprehensive list. Axel Merk - 4/27/2007 Merk Hard Currency Fund It is not our role to endorse a presidential candidate, especially not this early in the process. We don't agree with all of his views, but highly respect his no-nonsense approach to fiscal and monetary policy issues. We encourage everyone to familiarize themselves with the fiscal views of Congressman Ron Paul. He is living proof that it is possible to be a fiscally conservative politician with integrity. See here for full statement - - - - Harry Schultz: HSL 662, 30 September 2007, page 6: Ron Paul (for US presideing) is obviously the only election chance for upgrading the US govt. All others are just reruns of wrong principles & policies. If U want to help the cause of freedom with $'s go to: https://www.ronpaul2008.com/do
nate
. (No public version available) - - - - Jim Rogers: October 29, 2007 "[Ron Paul] is the only one I've seen in American politics that seems to have a clue with what's going on in the world..." Read more here. Watch the interview at Financial Times here - - - - Richard Russell: Russell's Remarks, November 6, 2007 The current issue of Time magazine surprised me. The issue had a two page report on libertarian, Dr. Ron Paul, the Texas Congressman, who is running for President. Ron believes in the US Constitution. Ron would like to shut down the Federal Reserve and go back to the gold standard. I gather Ron would end the war in Iraq -- further, he would close down all our 120 military bases that are spread across the face of the globe. Ron would legalize narcotics and thereby end our expensive and idiotic "war on drugs." I guess, to make it short, Ron would pretty much get the government out of our hair, and return it to its original Constitutional form. I'm all for that. Furthermore, I'd mandate that every US Congressman and Senator be fully conversant with the US Constitution. I'd mandate that each and every one of them take an intensive course in Constitutional law. What they'd learn would probably shock them, but they'd get over it. I'll vote for Ron Paul in the coming election. He's not going to win, but I just can't see myself voting for one of the other candidates. "Why are they running?" I ask. "Do they stand for anything different? Do they question where this nation is heading? Do they ask how this nation is going to continue living on borrowed money? Do they ask why the Federal Reserve was never subject to a Constitutional Amendment?" Read the entire excerpt here - - - - Peter Schiff endorses Ron Paul: November 7, 2007 I recently had the pleasure of personally handing the Honorable Ron Paul (the only member of Congress truly worthy of that title) a $2,300 check (the legal maximum) as my contribution toward his presidential campaign. I have never given one dime to a politician (though Congressman Paul is more of a statesman than a politician) in my life, and you know what; it felt great. It was the best $2,300 I ever spent. The purpose of this email is to urge every single one of my clients, every subscriber to my newsletter, and every one in my database, to make a similar contribution. Doug Casey On November 9th, 2007 Slatterypod says: Doug Casey has voiced his support for Ron Paul, not only for his economic sense, but for his approach to foreign and domestic policy as well. http://slatterypod.com/blog/in
dex.php
... James Grant of Grant's Interest Rate Observer! http://www.grantspub.com/ http://dailypaul.com/node/6092
Listen to part of an interview here on YouTube http://www.youtube.com/watch?v
=9UuivY
... Less

ronpaulvstyranny

Added Dec 9, 2007  

Channel News

Duration 6:2   |   views 253931

VIP Comments 0

Recent Comments 1639

Rating:


Tags teaparty07  ron  paul  ben  bernake  cnbc  financial  fed  federal  reserve  dollar  devaluation  currency  manipulation 


Permalink:

Facebook

Ads



Categories

  • advantages of mutual funds
  • best money market mutual funds 2010
  • bonds
  • brokerage account
  • corporate money market accounts
  • currency converter
  • currency exchange
  • demand deposit account
  • funds of fund
  • funds of funds
  • investing mutual funds
  • money exchange
  • money market account online
  • Money Market Funds
  • mutual fund risks
  • mutual funds wiki
  • mutual funds wikipedia
  • online money market savings accounts

Ads



Quick Links

puro
gwyneth
toreros
marauder
10man
wowweeee
100$
bar
swayamsevak
jagan
cs10
10/20/11
apocevil
adsword
agiprodj
Shoulder
817781
cinebench
músic
spawner

Twitter Feeds

RohrkDM:  Deal forthcoming on moneymarketfunds? WSJ reports big players are at table. http://t.co/l6pxnUwo View Tweet
NiciElmore:  The Loanable Funds#Theory, Global Effects of Excessive Borrowing &MoneyMarketFunds: Finance Basics - http://t.co/kJHlO2RK View Tweet
Ednnrioa:  Fitch: Market Sentiment Improves Among U.S. MoneyMarketFunds; Regulatory Uncertainties Persist http://t.co/AEDdCGBw View Tweet
eeezzzlink_2010:  Are Investors Running Out of Safe Havens to Put Money?: In the most recent week, moneymarketfunds, where investors stow their cash ... View Tweet
ElmoreNicole:  The Loanable Funds#Theory, Global Effects of Excessive Borrowing &MoneyMarketFunds: Finance Basics - http://t.co/eKeIBRQu View Tweet

Links

Boozho
YouTube
Hulu
Daily Motion
Meta Cafe
Mega Video
My Space

Home  | Top Rated Videos  | Most Viewed  | Most Recent  | Recently Featured  | Recently Published  | Contact us